Nabi Hasan Mohd Murtuza Ansari v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Principal Secretary And Another

2024:BHC-AUG:13536-DB ( 1 ) 917 wp 6581.24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 917 WRIT PETITION NO. 6581 OF 2024 NABI HASAN MOHD MURTUZA ANSARI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ANOTHER .....

Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. P.S. Talekar h/f. Talekar & Associates Addl. GP for Respondents/State : Mr. M.M. Nerlikar .....

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE :

5th July, 2024 P.C. :- 1.

This matter was heard for quite some time, on 03.07.2024. 2.

The order under the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 has been passed against the company on 17.04.2023. Per contra, the contention of the Petitioner is that he was not a Director for the period April 2017 to June 2017 (Value Added Tax) and December 2017 to December 2017 and April 2019 to March 2020 (GST).

3.

The learned AGP submits today on instructions, that pursuant to the notice dated 06.02.2024, at page 18 of the Petition paper book, no further orders are passed since the Department expects the Petitioner to tender his

( 2 ) 917 wp 6581.24 written response. The learned advocate for the Petitioner submits on instructions that a written response would be filed within 15 days. 4.

The above statements are recorded. This Writ Petition is disposed off.

5.

Needless to state, Respondent No.2 shall follow the procedure laid down in law while dealing with the recovery notice dated 06.02.2024 and the written response of the Petitioner and pass a reasoned order within 60 days from the date of receipt of the written response. All contentions of the parties are kept open.

[Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.] [RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.] mub