Eknath Shankar Tupe And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary And ORS

69 Wp-7898-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7898 OF 2024 Eknath Shankar Tupe and Others.

...Petitioners.

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Others.

...Respondents.

------ Mr. Prabhakar M. Jadhav for the Petitioner.

Ms.M. P.Thakur, AGP for the Respondent-State. ------ Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.

Date : November 26, 2024.

P. C. :

1.

Learned AGP submits that in the present case, order of Tahsildar records that there has been transportation of Murum from one place to anther and therefore the decision in the case of Promoters and Builders Association of Pune v. State of Maharashtra1 may not apply in the present case. She seeks time to file affidavit-in-reply. Let an affidavit-in-reply be filed within a period of two weeks from today. Rejoinder, if any, to be filed within one week thereafter. 2.

List on 6th January 2025. Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next date.

[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] 2015(12) SCC 736.

Patil-SR 1 of Signed by: Sachin R. Patil Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 28/11/2024 19:24:56