Chetna Chandrakant Sutar v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Secretary School Education And Sports And ORS
TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2024.08.31 15:17:01 +0530 Trupti 1 2-wp-7929-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 7929 OF 2024 Smt.Chetna Chandrakant Sutar ...
Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...
Respondents .......
Mr.Prashant Bhavake for the Petitioner.
Mr.M.M.Pabale, AGP for the Respondent -State. .......
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR, AND M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.
DATE : 29 August 2024.
P.C.
The Petitioner will give notice to Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and file affidavit of service. Stand over to 1 October 2024. 2.
The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that after the proposal was rejected on 3 August 2022, this writ petition is filed on 15 April 2024. It appears that the Respondent-Management is not standing by the proposal was already submitted. After its rejection, the Petitioner apprehends termination of his service.
Trupti 2 2-wp-7929-2024.doc 3.
In view of the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of St. Ulai High School and Another vs. Devendraprasad Jagannath Singh and Another1, the Petitioner's service cannot be terminated merely because the approval is not granted. The Respondent-Management is bound by this position of law. 4.
Liberty to the Petitioner to annex the copy of this order with notice.
(M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) 2007 (1) Mh.L.J.