← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8248/2024disposed off

Mitali Pravin Gavate v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

2026-05-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'Ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav2 pages

2026:BHC-AUG:21461-DB {1} wp8248-24.doc drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8248 OF 2024 Mitali Pravin Gavate PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. Shantanu A. Deshpande, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. R. Wakale, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. H. A. Bajaj h/f Mr. A. S. Bajaj, Advocate for Respondents No.2 and 3 Mr. S. A. Raut h/f Mr. N. L. Chaudhari, Advocate for Respondent No.4 .......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.] DATE : 6 th MAY, 2026 ORDER :

1.

Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that, during the pendency of the Petition, the dispute between the Petitioner and Respondent No.4 i.e. her mother in law, is settled and consent terms are executed by them. The duly verified consent terms are placed on record. The parties are identified by their respective advocates. The consent terms are marked "X" for the purpose of identification.

2.

In view of amicable settlement of the dispute between the

{2} wp8248-24.doc parties and as the Petitioner has got appointment on compassionate ground, the purpose of filing the Writ Petition is served. The Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of as infructuous.

[ VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE drp/wp8248-24.doc