Sushil Bansi Jadhav And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

908-WP-8453-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL WRIT PETITION NO. 8453 OF 2024 by VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2024.07.23 19:21:28 +0530 Sushil Bansi Jadhav And Anr.

...Petitioners

Versus

The State Of Maharashtra And Ors.

...Respondents

....

Mr.Suraj Naik for the Petitioners.

Ms.Gauri Jadhav,A.G.P "A" Panel Counsel with Mr.Hamid Mulla for the Respondent - State.

Mr.Rajat Dighe for the Respondent No.2.

....

CORAM

:

AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.

DATE :

23rd JULY, 2024 P.C.

:

1.

The learned counsel for the respondent No.2, submits that after receipt of the possession of the premises in question, some body has broken open the lock and has entered the property, in respect of which a complaint is claimed to have been lodged with the concerned Police Station on 16.07.2024. That however, is an issue, which unless it is pointed out that, this has been done by the present petitioner, cannot be gone into in this proceedings. The learned counsel for the petitioners upon VAI

908-WP-8453-2024.doc instructions makes a statement that the aforesaid act, has not been done by the petitioners and cannot be attributed to him. 2.

List the matter on 30.07.2024, by which time the learned AGP shall take instructions and report as to whom the said act is attributable.

(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) VAI