Bhikaji Manaji Ghanghav And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector Nashik And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.8517 OF 2024

1. Bhikaji Manaji Ghanghav ]

2. Sagar Shankar Ghangav ] .. Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Maharashtra, ] Through Collector, Nashik ]

2. Revenue Commissioner ]

3. Bhausaheb Bhikaji Ghanghav ]

4. Revenue Minister, State of Maharashtra ] .. Respondents by SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT Date:

2024.07.17 13:15:38 +0530 Mr. Sahil Choudhary with Mr. Narayan Rokade, Advocates for the Petitioners.

Mrs. M.S. Srivastava, Assistant Government Pleader for the RespondentState of Maharashtra. Mr. Bhushan Y. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ DATE : 16TH JULY, 2024.

ORAL JUDGMENT : { Per A.S. Chandurkar, J. } 1.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Mrs. M.S. Srivastava, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives notice for respondent nos.1, 2 and 4. Mr. Bhushan Deshmukh, learned counsel waives notice for respondent no.3.

2.

The only relief sought by the petitioners is for consideration of their prayer for grant of stay in the revision application that has been preferred against the order dated 16th February 2024 passed by the Additional Divisional Commissioner.

3.

In the light of the fact that the revision application has been filed on 1/2 905-WP-8517-2024.doc Dixit

25th April 2024, it is directed that the prayer for interim relief shall be considered on its own merit and the same be decided within a period of eight weeks from receiving copy of this order. The proceedings in the revision application are expedited.

4.

All points raised on merit are kept open. Rule accordingly. No costs. 5.

Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. [ RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ] 2/2 905-WP-8517-2024.doc Dixit