← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8684/2024disposed off

Vinay Agarwal v. Union Of India And ORS

2024-07-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak2 pages

10 wp8684-24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

Digitally signed by TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE Date:

2024.07.12 10:52:25 +0530 TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8684 OF 2024.

Vinay Agarwal .. Petitioner

Versus

Union of India and Ors.

.. Respondents Mr.Cyrus Ardeshir, Mr.Dharam Jumani, Mr.Mihir Nerurkar, Ms.Gauri Joshi i/b M/s.Ganesh and Co., Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms.Savita Ganoo a/w Mr.D.P.Singh, Advocate for Respondent No.1 and 2.

Mr.Ajay Khaire, Advocate for Respondent No.3 (AAI). Mr.G.S.Hegde, Senior Counsel a/w Ms.Pinky Bhansali, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5 (CIDCO).

CORAM:

B. P. COLABAWALLA & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.

DATE:

JULY 11, 2024 P. C.

1.

Before we decide the above Writ Petition, it would be absolutely necessary for the Airport Authority of India (Respondent No.3) to file an Affidavit in Reply to the above Writ Petition. We say this because what is challenged in the above Writ Petition is the rejection of the re-validation of JULY 11, 2024 Mohite

10 wp8684-24.doc the 2014 NOC granted to the Petitioner for development of his layout. This reply shall be filed by Respondent No.3 within a period of two weeks from today and a copy of the same shall be served on the Advocates for the Petitioner as well as all other Respondents.

2.

We now place this matter on 30th July 2024.

3.

If any of the other Respondents want to file any Reply, they are also free to do so within two weeks from today and serve a copy of the same on the Advocates for the Petitioner.

4.

This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/ Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax [FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.] JULY 11, 2024 Mohite