Nitin S/O Namdeo Ingale v. The State Of Maharashtra Throu. Its Principal Sec. Rural Development Dept And ORS

10 WP-8695-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8695 OF 2024 Nitin S/O. Namdeo Ingale

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

*** Mr. Ratan L. Adhe, for Petitioner.

Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP for Respondent/State.

*** CORAM: NITIN JAMDAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.

by HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF Date: 2024.07.01 18:45:12 +0530 HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF DATE : 27 JUNE 2024 P.C.:

.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The grievance of the Petitioner is that the transfer of the Petitioner from Raigad Zilla Parishad to Pune Municipal Corporation is approved by both the Chief Executive Officer of the Zilla Parishad and Municipal Commissioner of the Pune Corporation, however, the Administrative Officer (Primary), Pune Municipal Corporation- Respondent No. 5 is not issuing a direction. 3.

If both the authorities have already taken a decision in favour of the Petitioner, as contended, then it is a matter only of ministerial work of issuing the order.

Husen 1

10 WP-8695-2024.doc 4.

Therefore, we permit the Petitioner to approach Respondent No. 4- Municipal Commissioner, Pune with a request that necessary order be issued at the earliest.

5.

The Municipal Commissioner, Pune to look into the issue expeditiously and take necessary decision as per law. 6.

The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the representation in writing would be made to the Municipal Commissioner, Pune within a period of 2 weeks from today. 7.

Writ petition is disposed of in above terms.

( M.M. SATHAYE, J.) ( NITIN JAMDAR, J.) Husen 2