Shekhar Mohan Dabholkar v. The State Ofmaharashtra And ANR

18-WP-8975-2024-(C).odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8975 OF 2024 Shekhar Mohan Dabholkar

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. Shivshankar Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.D. Vyas, Addl. G.P. a/w Ms. Pooja Joshi Deshpande, AGP for Respondent No.1/State.

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.

DATE : 25th NOVEMBER, 2024 PER COURT :- 1.

Leave to amend the prayer clauses. Amendment be carried out forthwith.

2.

We find that the Acting Chairperson of the Maharashtra by SUNNY ANKUSHRAO THOTE Date:

2024.11.28 09:50:42 +0530 SUNNY ANKUSHRAO THOTE State Human Rights Commission has used intemperate language while passing the impugned order dated 16th April, 2021. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has time and again reminded the Courts that intemperate or harsh language should not be used against the Courts, Judicial officers, or even Public Servants. SUNNY THOTE

18-WP-8975-2024-(C).odt 3.

Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 15th January, 2025. The learned Additional G.P. waives service of notice on behalf of Respondent No.1.

4.

Let the affidavit in reply be filed, at least one week, prior to the returnable date.

5.

Until further orders, the impugned order dated 16th April, 2024, shall stand stayed.

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) SUNNY THOTE