Bhidesh Kumar Sitaram Gupta v. The State Of Maharashtra Throu.Divisional Commissioner Appeal And ORS

9.wp.9108.24.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9108 OF 2024 Bindesh Kumar Sitaram Gupta .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

.. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Sujit Holamagi, Advocate for Petitioner.

 Mrs. V.R. Raje, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 - State. ...................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : JULY 16, 2024.

P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Holamagi, learned Advocate for Petitioner and Mrs. Raje, learned AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 - State. 2.

Statutory Appeal dated 21.05.2024 including Application for stay which has already been filed by the Writ Petitioner before the Competent Authority and is pending before the Competent Court i.e. Appellate Authority is directed to be decided as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of four weeks from today. 3.

Affidavit-in-Reply filed by Mrs. Raje, learned AGP is taken on record.

4.

Without delineating and opining on any merits of the matter, all contentions of the Writ Petitioner are expressly kept open to be agitated before the Appellate Authority in the Statutory Appeal.

9.wp.9108.24.doc 5.

Needless to state that pursuant to the decision in the Appeal by the Appellate Authority, all contentions of the Writ Petitioner to challenge the said order, if the order is adverse to the Writ Petitioner are expressly kept open.

6.

The Appellate Authority shall take cognizance of a server copy of this order and shall not insist on production of certified copy of this order.

7.

With the above directions, Writ Petition is disposed. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2024.07.16 17:12:35 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE