Manisha Laxman Damse v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2024.08.31 10:52:04 +0530 Trupti 1 3-WP-9176-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 9176 OF 2024 Manisha Laxman Damse ...

Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...

Respondents ........

Mr.Saurabh Pakale i/b. Ms.Padmaja Malgaonkar for the Petitioner. Ms.Nisha Mehra, AGP for Respondent No.1-State. Mr.D.P.Singh for Respondent No.5 -UOI.

.......

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR, AND M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.

DATE : 29 August 2024.

P.C.

According to us, the presence of Union of India is not necessary. Leave is granted to delete the name of Respondent No. 5 from the array of parties. In case, during the course of hearing, it is found that the presence of Union of India is necessary, leave can always be granted accordingly. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

2.

The Petitioner will give notice to unrepresented Respondents and file affidavit of service. Stand over to 27 September 2024. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)