Kishan Kondiba Bhosle v. Govind Kondiba Bhosle And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6379 OF 2022 Bhagirath Devkaran Jakad

Versus

The Additional Commissioner Revenue And Others Mr. Mane Dhananjay A, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V. S. Badakh, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 AND WRIT PETITION NO. 1016 OF 2024 Rajesaheb Venkatrao Gore And Others

Versus

The Additional Commissioner Ror And Others Mr. Godbharle Vinod D., Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. N. D. Raje,AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 Mr. R. P. Bhumkar, Advocate for Respondent No. 7 Mr. D. Y. Nandedkar, Advocate for Respondent No. 5 AND WRIT PETITION NO. 4299 OF 2024 Shivkantabai Veerbhadra Chinchole And Another

Versus

Ramakant Mallappa Chinchole And Others Mr. Gunale Vishwamber Digamberrao, Advocate for the Petitioners AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8795 OF 2024 Nitin Sidram Pagdyakul

Versus

Pranita Nitin Pagdyakul Mr. P. D. Purway And Mr. D. D. Deshmukh, Advocates for the Petitioner AND

WRIT PETITION NO. 9407 OF 2024 Kishan Kondiba Bhosle

Versus

Govind Kondiba Bhosle And Others Mr. Deshmukh Rahul Rajiv And Mr. Rajiv B. Deshmukh, Advocates for the Petitioner AND WRIT PETITION NO. 11413 OF 2024 Mahesh Bhausaheb Surase

Versus

The Registrar General Of Money Lending And Special Registrar And Others Mr. Tungar Nikhilesh K., Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V. M. Chate,AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1778 OF 2025 IN WP/11413/2024 AND WRIT PETITION NO. 12513 OF 2024 Navnath Laxman Shewale

Versus

Namrata Rajesh Padvi And Another Mr. Pandit Sushil Pushpendra, Advocate for the Petitioner AND WRIT PETITION NO. 13548 OF 2024 Sitabai Aasaram Nade

Versus

The Competent Authority Land Acquisition And Another Adv. Jadhav Kiran D., Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondent No. 1

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 13566 OF 2024 CORAM :

ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.

DATE :

JULY 21, 2025 O R D E R :

1.

Await notice.

2.

Issue fresh notice to respondents returnable on 18.08.2025. 3.

Petitioners are permitted to serve the respondents by all permissible modes of private service in addition to regular mode of service.

4.

Interim relief, if any, to continue till the next date of hearing. [ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.]