Ganesh Pandurang Barke And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra Through Sevretary And ORS

41 WP 9900 OF 2024.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9900 OF 2024 Ganesh Pandurang Barke and Anr.

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Prathamesh Bhargude, advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Onkar Somvanshi (Through VC) advocate for Respondent Nos. 8 and 9 Ms. M. S. Bane, AGP for State-Respondent Nos.1 and 4 to 7. Mr. Bharat Gadhavi i/b. Mr. R.R. Chavan, advocate for Respondent No.2.

CORAM:

SUMAN SHYAM & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATED:

3RD OCTOBER 2025.

PC:- 1.

Mr. Bharat Gadhavi, learned counsel for Respondent No.2 has invited our attention to the order dated 12th September, 2025 to submit that it was not the reply of his client, but an additional affidavit, which was required to be filed. This Court had closed the rights of Respondent No.2 to file reply because the correct facts are not pointed out due to the absence of Respondent No.2 on that RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER date. After going through the record, we find force in the submission of learned counsel for Respondent No.2. We, therefore, RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER Date: 2025.10.06 12:06:02 +0530 grant Respondent No.2 one week's time to file additional affidavit. 3rd October 2025 Rajeshri Aher

41 WP 9900 OF 2024.DOC 2.

List on 10th October, 2025 along with additional affidavit, if filed by Respondent No.2. The order dated 12th September, 2025 stands modified accordingly.

3.

Mr. Prathamesh Bhargude, learned counsel for the Petitioners is at liberty to file Interim Application, if any. (MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) { 3rd October 2025 Rajeshri Aher