Bombay High CourtWP/10820/2024disposed off

State Bank Of India Throu. Its Rambhau K Taktewale v. The State Of Maharashtra Tahsildar Bhivandi Throu. Govt Pleader And ANR

2025-03-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash2 pages

1/2 paucity order.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION AND ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & M.M.SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 26th MARCH, 2025 P.C. :- On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Daily and Supplementary Board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CIS.

Sr. Nos.

C.I.S. DATE 25, 56 (Appellate Side) 01.04.2025 51 and 52 (Appellate Side) 02.04.2025 45, 50 (Appellant Side) 09.04.2025 23, 24, 42 (Appellate Side) 17.04.2025 28, 29, 30 (Appellant Side) 26, 27 (Original side) 26.06.2025 31, 33, 34 (Appellate Side) 32, 35 (Original Side) 27.06.2025 37, 38, 39, 40 (Appellate Side) 36 (Original Side) 30.06.2025 41, 42, 44, 46 (Appellate Side) 43 (original Side) 01.07.2025 47, 49, 54 (Appellate Side) 48, 53 (original side) 02.07.2025 Sneha Chavan

2/2 paucity order.doc If in any of the above matters, ad-interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If ad-interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. [ M.M.SATHAYE, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ] Sneha Chavan