← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/11437/2024dismissed

Aquamac Enterprises Sole Proprietorship v. Nashik Municipal Corporation And ORS

2025-02-18Hon'Ble The Chief Justice , Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik2 pages

Digitally signed by MEERA MAHESH JADHAV Date:

2025.02.20 11:42:46 +0530 1/2 31--wp-11437-24.doc MEERA MAHESH JADHAV

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11437 OF 2024 Aquamac Enterprises & Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

Nashik Municipal Corporation & Anr

...Respondents

Mr. Jash Gandhi a/w Mr. Chittesh Dalmia for Petitioners. Mr. M. L. Patil for Respondent Nos.1 & 2.

Mr. Rishikesh Soni a/w Mr. V. R. Kasle and Mr. Tushar i/b Ram & Co. for Respondent No.3 CORAM : ALOK ARADHE, CJ & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J DATED : 18th FEBRUARY 2025 P. C. :

This Petition inter alia assails the validity of the email dated 24th July 2024, by which the technical bid of the petitioners has been rejected. The Petitioner in addition seeks to set aside the work order dated 9th August 2024 issued in favour of Respondent No.3 and to direct the respondents to recognize the Petitioners as manufactures as stated in Gas Cylinder Rules 2016.

We have heard the Learned Counsel for the parties. The synopsis produced before us does not disclose neither the details nor the period of contract. The Petitioners have also failed to disclose in the synopsis as to on what count the technical bid was rejected.

Meera Jadhav

2/2 31--wp-11437-24.doc In view of the aforesaid, the Learned Counsel for the Petitioners to prepare a fresh synopsis.

Stand over to 18th March 2025.

(ARIF S. DOCTOR J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) Meera Jadhav