Late Namdeo Bala Bandal Since Decd. Thr. Lrs And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Rehabilitaion Department And ORS
2025:BHC-AS:18598-DB Sayyed 17-WP.11643.2024.docx IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.11643 OF 2024 WRIT PETITION NO.11643 OF 2024 Late Namdeo Bala Bandal Late Namdeo Bala Bandal Since deceased through LR's & Ors.
Since deceased through LR's & Ors.
...
...Petitioners
Petitioners
Versus
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...
...Respondents
Respondents _____________________________________________________ Mr. Y. B. Lengare a/w Mr. Aditya K. Gaikwad for the Petitioners. Mr. Y. B. Lengare a/w Mr. Aditya K. Gaikwad for the Petitioners. Mr. R. S. Pawar, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. R. S. Pawar, AGP for the Respondent-State. _____________________________________________________ CORAM : M. S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ.
DATED : 24 April 2025 PC.:- 1.
Heard Mr. Lengare for the Petitioners and Mr. Pawar, learned Heard Mr. Lengare for the Petitioners and Mr. Pawar, learned AGP for the State.
AGP for the State.
2.
The Petitioners have submitted a proposal dated 31 January The Petitioners have submitted a proposal dated 31 January 2023 for allotment of alternate land in respect of bearing Gat 2023 for allotment of alternate land in respect of bearing Gat Nos.1838/2A, 11838/2B and 11838/1/B/1 at village Pimpalgaon Nos.1838/2A, 11838/2B and 11838/1/B/1 at village Pimpalgaon Tarfekhed and Gat No.535/2 at village Bahul, Taluka Khed, District Tarfekhed and Gat No.535/2 at village Bahul, Taluka Khed, District Pune.
Pune.
3.
Learned counsel for the Petitioners points out that despite Learned counsel for the Petitioners points out that despite earlier directions issued by this Court, the proposal is not being decided earlier directions issued by this Court, the proposal is not being decided by Respondent Nos.3 and 4 expeditiously.
by Respondent Nos.3 and 4 expeditiously.
4.
Mr. Pawar, learned AGP states that the Petitioners' proposal Mr. Pawar, learned AGP states that the Petitioners' proposal will be decided in accordance with law within two months from today. will be decided in accordance with law within two months from today. 5.
By accepting the above statements, we dispose of this petition. By accepting the above statements, we dispose of this petition. We, however, note that within two months the proposal must be We, however, note that within two months the proposal must be
Sayyed 17-WP.11643.2024.docx decided because the Petitioners cannot be forced to come to this Court decided because the Petitioners cannot be forced to come to this Court repeatedly.
repeatedly.
6.
We request Mr. Pawar to immediately forward an We request Mr. Pawar to immediately forward an authenticated copy of this order to Respondent Nos.3 and 4, so that authenticated copy of this order to Respondent Nos.3 and 4, so that there is no delay in deciding on the Petitioners' proposal in accordance there is no delay in deciding on the Petitioners' proposal in accordance with law.
with law.
(Jitendra Jain, J.) (M. S. Sonak, J.) Signed by: Sayyed Saeed Ali Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 25/04/2025 11:02:49