Sahebrao Gangadhar Kadam And ANR v. Tahasildar Nashik And ORS

10 wp 11850-24-c.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.11850 OF 2024 Sahebrao Gangadhar Kadam and ors.

... Petitioners V/s.

Tahasildar, Nashik and ors.

... Respondents ______________ Mr. Chaitanya Nikte with Mr. Swapnil Meera Dilip Sangle i/by Ms. Sneha Bhange, Advocates for the Petitioners.

Mr. B. B. Dahiphale, AGP for the State.

Mr. Harshad M. Inamdar, Advocate for the Respondent No.3. _______________ CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

Dated : 11 February, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

There is an alternate and equally efficacious remedy of filing Appeal before the Sub-Divisional Officer challenging the order passed by Tahasildar. In view of availability of alternate remedy, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present petition.

2.

The petition is accordingly disposed of leaving open the alternate remedy of filing Appeal for the Petitioner. 3.

Time spend in prosecuting the present petition shall be considered for Digitally signed by PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Date:

2025.02.12 14:58:24 +0530 condonation of delay in filing the Appeal.

PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) Priya Soparkar Page No.

1 of