Sattu Rabhaji Bendre Since Deceased L.H Dyaneshwar S Bendure v. The State Of Maharashtra Throu. Sec. Rehabilitation Dept And ORS
2025:BHC-AS:18600-DB Sayyed 19-WP.13029.2024.docx IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.13029 OF 2024 WRIT PETITION NO.13029 OF 2024 Sattu Rabhaji Bendre Sattu Rabhaji Bendre Since Deceased through LrsSince Deceased through Lrs1A. Dyaneshwar Sattu Bendure 1A. Dyaneshwar Sattu Bendure ...
...Petitioner
Petitioner
Versus
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...
...Respondents
Respondents _____________________________________________________ Mr. Y. B. Lengare a/w Mr. Aditya K. Gaikwad for the Petitioner. Mr. Y. B. Lengare a/w Mr. Aditya K. Gaikwad for the Petitioner. Mr. P. P. More, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. P. P. More, AGP for the Respondent-State. _____________________________________________________ CORAM : M. S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ.
DATED : 24 April 2025 PC.:- 1.
Heard Mr. Lengare for the Petitioner and Mr. More, learned Heard Mr. Lengare for the Petitioner and Mr. More, learned AGP for the State.
AGP for the State.
2.
The Petitioner has submitted proposals dated 20 December The Petitioner has submitted proposals dated 20 December 2023, 8 February 2024 and 24 April 2024 for allotment of alternate 2023, 8 February 2024 and 24 April 2024 for allotment of alternate land in respect of bearing Gat No.219 admeasuring 80 Ares at village land in respect of bearing Gat No.219 admeasuring 80 Ares at village Kharpudi Kh., Taluka Khed, District Pune, Gat No.132/2 admeasuring 1 Kharpudi Kh., Taluka Khed, District Pune, Gat No.132/2 admeasuring 1 Hector 20 Ares and Gat No.166/2 admeasuring 80 Ares at village Hector 20 Ares and Gat No.166/2 admeasuring 80 Ares at village Jategaon Kh., Taluka Shirur, District Pune and allot alternate land to the Jategaon Kh., Taluka Shirur, District Pune and allot alternate land to the extend of 2 Hector.
extend of 2 Hector.
3.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner points out that despite Learned counsel for the Petitioner points out that despite earlier directions issued by this Court, the proposal is not being decided earlier directions issued by this Court, the proposal is not being decided by Respondent Nos.3 and 4 expeditiously.
by Respondent Nos.3 and 4 expeditiously.
4.
Mr. More, learned AGP states that the Petitioner's proposal Mr. More, learned AGP states that the Petitioner's proposal will be decided in accordance with law within two months from today. will be decided in accordance with law within two months from today.
Sayyed 19-WP.13029.2024.docx 5.
By accepting the above statements, we dispose of this petition. By accepting the above statements, we dispose of this petition. We, however, note that within two months the proposal must be We, however, note that within two months the proposal must be decided because the Petitioner cannot be forced to come to this Court decided because the Petitioner cannot be forced to come to this Court repeatedly.
repeatedly.
6.
We request Mr. More to immediately forward an authenticated We request Mr. More to immediately forward an authenticated copy of this order to Respondent Nos.3 and 4, so that there is no delay copy of this order to Respondent Nos.3 and 4, so that there is no delay in deciding on the Petitioner's proposal in accordance with law. in deciding on the Petitioner's proposal in accordance with law. (Jitendra Jain, J.) (M. S. Sonak, J.) Signed by: Sayyed Saeed Ali Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 25/04/2025 11:03:58