← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/13629/2024transfer to other court

Rupesh Janardhan Kamble v. State Of Maharashtra Thr Prin. Secretary, Govt. Of Maharashtra And ORS

2025-04-29Hon'Ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale , Hon'Ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere2 pages

55-WP-13629-2024.DOCX Chaitanya

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Digitally signed by CHAITANYA ASHOK JADHAV Date:

2025.05.02 10:41:24 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 13629 OF 2024 CHAITANYA ASHOK JADHAV Rupesh Janardhan Kamble ... Petitioner

Versus

State Of Maharashtra Through Prin.

Secretary, Govt. Of Maharashtra And Ors.

... Respondents ______________________________________________________ Mr Gaurav Potnis a/w Ms Radhika Chittewar i/b P. H. Potnis, for Petitioner.

Mr M. S. Bane, A.G.P for Respondent-State.

Mr. Kedar B. Dighe, for Respondent No.4.

______________________________________________________ CORAM : M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ.

DATED : 29 APRIL 2025 PC:- 1.

Mr Potnis states that the third Respondent has refused to accept service. He has also filed an affidavit in this regard. 2.

Mr Potnis is requested to serve Advocate Mr Rakesh Singh, who, instructed by M/s. Kini and Co., usually appears on behalf of NHAI.

3.

In addition to the above, the Petitioner should also once again attempt service on the third Respondent and file an affidavit of service. This time, if service is refused, the name of

55-WP-13629-2024.DOCX the officer refusing the service, should also to be stated in the affidavit.

4.

In the meantime, Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 must also file affidavit by 13 June 2025, stating whether the property which is the subject matter of this Petition has been acquired; and if so, the details of such acquisition must be filed alongwith this affidavit.

5.

List this matter on 27 June 2025. Subject to constraints of time, this Petition will be disposed of finally at the admission stage. The third Respondent has been served by an e-mail but despite service as now directed, the third Respondent refuses to appear, we will proceed with this matter in their absence.

6.

Ad-interim order, granted earlier, to operate till the next date.

(Jitendra Jain, J) (M.S. Sonak, J)