Vishakha Jayaram Ghegad And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Secretary Dept Of Education And Sports And ORS

13-WP-13827-2024-(C).odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13827 OF 2024 Vishakha Jayaram Ghegad & Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Sanjeev Deore a/w Ms. Suchita Pawar, Mr. Jitendra Pagare, Advocate for the Petitioners.

Ms. A.A. Purav, AGP for Respondent No.1/State. CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.

DATE : 9th DECEMBER, 2024 P.C. :- 1.

The grievance of the Petitioners is that the Zilla Parishad, Pune is not issuing an appointment order only because the names of the Petitioners appear in the Teacher Eligibility Test (T.E.T.) results scam. Criminal investigation is on going. by SUNNY ANKUSHRAO THOTE Date:

2024.12.12 09:48:10 +0530 SUNNY ANKUSHRAO THOTE 2.

The case before us is such that the prospective Employer desires to check the antecedents of a candidate, who is likely to be engaged as an Employee. Therefore, the issue would be whether the prospective Employer can be issued with a Writ of SUNNY THOTE

13-WP-13827-2024-(C).odt Mandamus to engage a candidate, whose antecedents are tainted. 3.

Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 28th January, 2025. The learned AGP waives service of notice on behalf of Respondent No.1.

4.

Let the affidavit in reply be filed, at least ten days, prior to the returnable date.

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) SUNNY THOTE