Janhavi Dhananjay Warang And ANR v. Specy Denzil Dsouza And ORS

7-wp-13843-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.13843 OF 2024 NIKITA KAILAS DARADE Janhavi Dhananjay Warang and Anr. ...Petitioners NIKITA KAILAS DARADE Date: 2024.10.23 10:58:52 +0530 vs.

Specy Denzil D'souza and Ors. ...Respondents ***** Mr. Akash Warang:- Advocate for the Petitioners.

***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

21st OCTOBER 2024 P. C. :- 1.

Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioners-Plaintiffs. They have completed their evidence. They want to examine Mr. Natu who has sent a reply on behalf of Defendant No.1. The reply is dated 21st August 2006. The Plaintiff applied for examining Mr. Natu by the impugned order. It is rejected.

2.

There is averment in the amended plaint and in affidavit of examination-in-chief about this letter. Query is put what is the stand of Defendant No.1 taken in Additional Written Statement or while crossNikita 1/2

7-wp-13843-2024.doc examining the Plaintiff. Learned Counsel sought time to take the instructions. Let him file the Additional Written Statement and copy of cross examination on the next date.

3.

Stand over to 26th November 2024.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Nikita 2/2