M/S. Maharashtra Ex-Servicemen Corporation Ltd. Raigad v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Sonali Mane 910-WP-13893-2024.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13893 OF 2024 M/s. Maharashtra Ex-Servicemen Corporation Ltd. Raigad ... Petitioner

Versus

State of maharashtra and Anr.

... Respondents Mr. A. K. Chauhan for the Petitioner.

Ms. Priyanka B. Chavan, AGP for the Respondent No.1-State.

CORAM

: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

DATE : 9 OCTOBER 2024.

P.C. :

1) I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner.

2) The grievance of the Petitioner appears to be denial of an opportunity to produce Key Register and charter of the duties of the concerned Officer.

3) It appears that the Petitioner is in the process of examining its 4th witness and I do not see any reason why the said two documents ___Page No.

1 of 2 ___ 9 October 2024

Sonali Mane 910-WP-13893-2024.docx cannot be put in evidence through the said 4th witness. In that view of the matter, recall of witness No.3, to my mind, appears to be unnecessary.

4) Reserving the liberty for the Petitioner to produce necessary documents through witness No. 4, Writ Petition is disposed of.

[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] by MANE SONALI DILIP Date:

2024.10.11 13:31:28 +0530 MANE SONALI DILIP ___Page No.

2 of 2 ___ 9 October 2024