← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/14313/2024transfer to other court

Agatrao Keshav Pawar v. The Brahan Maharashtra Sugar Syndicate Ltd. And ORS

2024-12-03Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse2 pages

16 wp 14313 of 2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 14313 OF 2024 Agatrao Keshav Pawar ... Petitioner vs.

The Brahan Maharashtra Sugar Syndicate Ltd. & Ors.

... Respondents ***** Mr. B. A. Lawate :

Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. R. D. Phade :

Advocate for Respondent No.3.

***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE : 3rd DECEMBER 2024 P. C. :- 1.

Heard learned Advocate for Petitioner/ Plaintiff and learned Advocate for Respondent No. 3/ Purchaser from the Defendants No.1 and 2. The Court has already framed issues and the Plaintiff has completed his evidence and cross-examination also. Now, Suit is for recording of further evidence, if any. Defendant No.3 filed an Application for framing of additional issue. The trial Court has framed following issue (Page 97):

Kishor 1/2

16 wp 14313 of 2024.doc "Do Plaintiffs prove that they were and are a tenant of the suit property?"

2.

After that the trial Court has referred the issue to Tenancy Court. This order is challenged by the Petitioner/ Plaintiff. 3.

Issue notice before admission to Respondents No.1 and 2 returnable on 3 rd February 2025.

4.

Respondent No.3 waived notice.

5.

The Petitioner is at liberty to ask for adjournment from the trial Court and to seek the postponement of implementation of the impugned order. The trial Court to consider it positively. [S. M. MODAK, J.] by KISHOR VISHNU KAMBLE Date:

2024.12.06 11:18:40 +0530 KISHOR VISHNU KAMBLE Kishor 2/2