Manoj Gajanan Anaspure v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

51-WP-15319-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CHAITANYA ASHOK JADHAV CHAITANYA ASHOK JADHAV Date: 2026.03.10 13:13:36 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 15319 OF 2024 Manoj Gajanan Anaspure

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Rahul Kadam a/w Adv. Vedant Babar, for the Petitioner. Mr. Manish Kelkar, for the Respondent No. 3 and 4. Dr. Dhruti Kapadia, A.G.P, for Respondent State.

CORAM

: SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.

DATE : MARCH 9, 2026 ORDER :

1.

Registry is directed to place on record the judgement passed in Writ Petition No. 4014 of 1987, rendered by a Learned Division Bench on February 28, 1989, in the case of Mrs. Subhasini V. Kulkarni v. State of Maharashtra.

2.

Based on an extract from this judgement published by a publisher of Bare Acts with a footnote indicating this judgement, the Learned Advocate for the Petitioner points to how such judgement may squarely cover the matter in hand.

March 9, 2026 Chaitanya

51-WP-15319-2024.doc 3.

Therefore, it is considered appropriate to permit the parties to examine the aforesaid unreported judgement, and inspect the proceedings in Writ Petition No. 4014 of 1987. 4.

Stand over to March 17, 2026, under the caption PartHeard to enable the advocates to review the aforesaid proceedings and assist the Court.

5.

All actions required to be taken pursuant to this order shall be taken upon receipt of a downloaded copy as available on this Court's website.

[ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] March 9, 2026 Chaitanya