Vilas Shankar Kokira And ORS v. Landmark Developers Thr. Its Partner And ORS

Megha 12_wp_15981_2024.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.15981 OF 2024 Vilas Shankar Kokira and Ors.

...Petitioners

V/s.

Landmark Developers through its partners Dhirajlal Keshavji Gadda and Ors.

...Respondents

______________ Mr. Kishor Patil i/b. Mr. Arjun S. Pawar for the Petitioners. Mr. R.S. Pawar, AGP for Respondent -State.

______________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

Dated: 19 March 2025.

P.C.:

1) It appears that there is an alternate remedy of filing of appeal under Section 6 of the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974. In the light of existence of alternate remedy, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present Petition. Petitioners would be free to exercise the alternate remedy of appeal, if maintainable in law. MEGHA SHREEDHAR PARAB 2) No opinion is expressed about limitation involved in MEGHA SHREEDHAR PARAB Date: 2025.03.21 10:26:32 +0530 exercise of alternate remedy of appeal.

3) Petition is accordingly disposed of.

[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No.

1 of 19 March 2025