Devi Construction Llp Thr. Its Partner Vinod Baney v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Gp. And ANR
Revati 83.WP.16625.24.docx SAYYED SAEED ALI AHMED ALI by SAYYED SAEED ALI AHMED ALI Date:
2025.01.24 18:17:24 +0530 IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.16625 OF 2024 WRIT PETITION NO.16625 OF 2024 Devi Construction LLP Through Devi Construction LLP Through Its partner Vinod Baney Its partner Vinod Baney ...
...Petitioner
Petitioner
Versus
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
...
...Respondents
Respondents _____________________________________________________ Mr. Dormaan J Dalal for Petitioner.
Mr. Dormaan J Dalal for Petitioner.
Ms S D Vyas, Addl. GP a/w Ms M S Bane AGP for Respondent. Ms S D Vyas, Addl. GP a/w Ms M S Bane AGP for Respondent. _____________________________________________________ CORAM :
M. S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ.
DATED : 24 January 2025 PC.:- 1.
Mr. Dalal, learned counsel for the petitioner, based on Mr. Dalal, learned counsel for the petitioner, based on instructions from petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw this petition. He instructions from petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw this petition. He states that the balance compensation referred to in our order dated 10 states that the balance compensation referred to in our order dated 10 January 2025 seems to have been paid to the petitioner on 22 January January 2025 seems to have been paid to the petitioner on 22 January 2025.
2025.
2.
Accordingly, leave is granted. This petition is disposed of as Accordingly, leave is granted. This petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
withdrawn.
3.
Mr. Dalal clarifies that the petitioner is dissatisfied with the Mr. Dalal clarifies that the petitioner is dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation and therefore, has already applied for quantum of compensation and therefore, has already applied for enhancement. The acceptance of balance compensation is without enhancement. The acceptance of balance compensation is without prejudice to pursue enhancement proceedings.
prejudice to pursue enhancement proceedings.
(Jitendra S. Jain, J.) (M. S. Sonak, J.)