D.P Jain And Company Infrastructure Throu. Niesh V Pachpor v. State Of Maharashtra Throu. Principal Sec. Revenue And Forest Dept And ORS

35 Wp-17370-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 17370 OF 2024.

D. P. Jain & Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

...Petitioner.

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Others.

...Respondents.

------ Mr. G. S. Godbole, Senior Advocate, Mr. Chinmay Dharmadhikari and Mr. Abhilash Srinivas i/b Mr. Anish Khandekar for the Petitioner. Mr. Kedar Dighe, Addl. Govt. Pleader and Ms. V. R. Raje, AGP for RespondentState. ------ Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.

Date : December 4, 2024.

P. C. :

1.

Mr. Godbole, learned Senior Advocate appearing for petitioner would point out that the Tahsildar has passed the impugned order based on communication/order of the Collector without giving any notice of hearing to the petitioner and therefore, even if the appeal is filed, the same is of no consonance as Tahsildar was merely implementing the order of Collector.

2.

Learned AGP seeks time to take instructions. List on 13th December, 2024 under the caption for 'Circulation'. [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Sairaj 1 of