← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/18028/2024disposed off

Sukesh Bhowal v. Union Of India Thr Secretary, Ministry Of Labour And Employment And ANR

2025-07-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav3 pages

Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 18028 OF 2024 Sukesh Bhowal .. Petitioner

Versus

Union of India, Through Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Employment and Ors.

.. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Shadab Jan a/w. Mr. Navin Arora, Advocates for Petitioner.  Ms. Anjali Helekar, Advocate for Respondent No.1 - Union of India.  Ms. Payoja Gandhi, Advocate for Respondent No.2 - EPFO.  Mr. Kiran Bapat, Senior Advocate a/w. Ritik Gupta, Advocate i/by Suvarna Joshi for Respondent No.3 - DCB Bank Ltd. ....................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : JULY 22, 2025.

P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Jan, learned Advocate for Petitioner; Ms. Helekar, learned Advocate for Respondent No.1 - Union of India; Ms. Gandhi, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 - EPFO and Mr. Bapat, learned Senior Advocate for Respondent No.3 - DCB Bank Ltd.. 2.

Today, learned Advocates have filed Minutes of Order dated 22.07.2025 which are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. Parties have reconciled their disputes and differences and filed Minutes of Order. Minutes of Orders are signed by Advocate for Petitioner, Advocate for Respondent No.2 and Advocate for Respondent No.3.

3.

Minutes of Order are running into 1 page. For immediate reference and convenience, copy of the Minutes of Order is scanned and reproduced below for the benefit of the parties:-

4.

In view of disposal of the Writ Petition, Respondent No.3 - Bank is directed to transfer the amount held to Respondent No.2 within a period of four (4) weeks from today and Respondent No.2 shall accept the same. Respondent No.2 shall accordingly reflect the said amount duly in the Provident Fund Account of Motilal Oswal Home Finance Limited where the Petitioner is working. 5.

In view of the above Minutes of Order and the statement of Advocate for Respondent No.2, Petition is disposed. 6.

Order in terms of Minutes of Order.

7.

All parties to act on a server copy of this order downloaded from the High Court website.

8.

In view of the above, Writ Petition is disposed. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.07.22 17:53:18 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE