Mayuri Navnath Taware And ORS v. State Of Maharashtra Through The G.P. High Court Mumbai And ORS

Paucity order 25.02.25.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION AND ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION by HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF Date:

2025.02.26 10:40:00 +0530 HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF COMMON ORDER CORAM: A.S. CHANDURKAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.

DATE : 25th FEBRUARY 2025 P.C. :

On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Daily and Supplementary Board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CIS. Sr. Nos.

C.I.S. DATE 32, 60. (Appellate Side) 11.03.2025

23. (Appellate Side) 19.03.2025 26, 29 (Appellate Side) 20.03.2025 33, 36, 37, 39, 40.(Appellate Side) 24.03.2025 42, 43. (Appellate Side) 25.03.2025 46, 73, 75, 76. (Appellate Side) 27.03.2025 49, 50, 54, 55, 56. (Appellate Side) 01.04.2025 57, 58, 59. (Appellate Side) 02.04.2025 64, 65, 66. (Appellate Side) 15.04.2025 24, 25. (Original Side) 19.03.2025 27, 28. (Original Side) 20.03.2025 45.(Original Side) 27.03.2025 61.(Original Side) 02.04.2025

63. (Original Side) 15.04.2025 If in any of the above matters, ad-interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If ad-interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected.

(M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.) Husen 1/1