Seema Dhimant Shah And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

906 Wp-18616-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 18616 OF 2024.

Seema Dhimant Shah And Others

...Petitioners.

Versus

The State Of Maharashtra and Others.

...Respondents.

------ Mr. Simil Purohit, Senior Advocate, Ms. Nikita Vardhan and Ms. Nidhi Pathak i/b Kanga and Co. for the Petitioner.

Mr. Piyush Raheja, Mr. Sahil Gandhi, Ms. Dimple Vora and Ms. Riddhi Shah i/b Markand Gandhi and Co. for Respondent No.2.

Ms. Priyanka Chavan, AGP for Respondent-State. ------ Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.

Date : December 13, 2024.

P. C. :

1.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that on or before 20th January, 2025, an endeavour would be made to identify the premises as set out in the Consent Minutes of the Order. 2.

Mr. Raheja, learned counsel for Respondent would submit that before the next date, Respondents would also endeavour to identify premises to ensure that the premises are available for the Petitioner to shift therein.

3.

In view of the above, list the petition for further consideration on 20th January, 2025. Interim Arrangement to continue till then. It is made clear that consent minutes are only by way of pro-tem Sairaj 1 of

906 Wp-18616-2024.doc arrangement and in case the parties are unable to amicably settle the issue, the matter will be heard on merits. To be listed along with Contempt Petition (ST) No.36111 of 2024.

4.

Parties to co-operate with each other for identification of the premises.

[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Sairaj 2 of