Hemantkumar Bhikaji Kamble Alias Dabholkar v. Shantaram Laxman Pawar

902-WP19254-2024.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 19254 OF 2024 Hemantkumar Bhikaji Kamble/Dabholkar

...Petitioner

Versus

Shantaram Laxman Pawar

...Respondent

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Mr. Brijesh Pathak, through Legal Aid, for the Petitioner. Mr. S. C. Mangle, for Respondent No.1.

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2025.01.30 10:32:39 +0530

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED:

28th JANUARY, 2025 PC:- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned Counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent has not been served with the copy of the Petition though a Caveat has been filed.

3.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner dispute this position. However, the learned Counsel for the petitioner undertakes to furnish a copy of the petition to the Counsel for the respondent during the course of the day. 4.

The learned Counsel for the respondent seeks time to work out the matter.

1/2

902-WP19254-2024.DOC 5.

The learned Counsel for the Respondent further submits, in the intervening period, the respondent will not precipitate the matter and seek an adjournment before the trial court.

6.

In view of the above statement, stand over to 18th February, 2025.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2