Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd., Mumbai v. Manorama Manohar Jambhale Thr.Her Husband And Next Friend Mr. Manohar Mahadev Jambhale And ORS.

M1 FA 142-25-C.DOC Priya Soparkar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.142 OF 2025 Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Mumbai.

...Appellant

Versus

Manorama Manohar Jambhale and ors.

...Respondents

Mr. T. J. Mendon, for the Respondent No.1.

CORAM:

R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATED:

12th JANUARY, 2026.

PC:- Not on board. Taken on board.

1.

This praecipe is moved for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 7th January, 2026 by Mr. T. J. Mendon, learned counsel for the Respondent No.1 contending that there are some typographical mistakes in paragraphs Nos.3, 10, 13, 14 and 15, which needs to be corrected.

2.

It is further contended that in paragraph No.12 the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court is recorded as "Kajal Vs. Jagdish Chand and ors.", instead of "United India Insurance Company Limited Vs. K. M. Poonam ", which calls for rectification. Digitally signed by PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Date:

2026.01.12 18:29:25 +0530 PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR 12th January, 2026.

M1 FA 142-25-C.DOC 3.

After hearing the learned counsel for the Respondent No.1, corrections in paragraphs Nos.3, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15 and also addition sentence about attendant charges in the order dated 7th January, 2026 are permitted.

4.

As far as the contention with regard to the future attendant charges with acceleration of Rs.2,000/- per month for 20 years is concerned, this contention cannot be considered for speaking to minutes, as it is not an advertent error.

5.

The order dated 7th January, 2026 shall stand modified to the above extent. Rest of the order would remain as it is. Let the corrected order be uploaded.

6.

Praecipe stands disposed of.

(R. M. JOSHI, J.) { 12th January, 2026.