Mr. S. L. Vanmala v. Airport Authority Of India Thr. Mr. Radhakrishna Eviction Officer Western Regional And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF Date:

2025.08.26 19:51:00 +0530 HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 631 OF 2025 Lokesh Ramnath Ramgude .

...Appellant V/s Airport Authority Of India Through Mr. Radhakrishna, Eviction Officer And Anr.

... Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 251 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 250 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 254 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 463 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 472 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 462 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 460 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 471 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 632 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 473 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 464 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 469 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 475 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 474 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 465 OF 2025

WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 470 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 468 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 246 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 253 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 245 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 252 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 256 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 248 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 249 OF 2025 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 247 OF 2025 **** Mr. Nitin Satpute a/w. Mr. Kishor Dhoke, Mr. Shobha Budhivant, Mr. Rachit Singh and Mr. Abhishek Bandekar for the Appellants. Mr. Shilpa Kapil a/w. Mr. Chidanand Kapil, Chanani Bavishi & Priti Karbhari for the Respondent No. 1-AAI.

Mr. Vikram Nankani, Sr. Advocate a/w. Mr. Chirag Kamdar, Ms. Shoma Maitra and a/w. Ms Samruddhi Mali i/b. Wadia Ghandy & Co. for Respondent No. 2.

**** CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.

DATE : 26th AUGUST, 2025 P.C. :

1.

This is a group of appeals filed under Section 28K of Airport Authority of India Act, 1994 impugning various orders of Eviction, directing the Appellants to evict the subject matter premises.

2.

Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 23.09.2025. Learned counsel appearing for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 waives service. 3.

Office is directed to call for record and proceedings from the authority which passed the impugned orders.

(M.M. SATHAYE, J.)