Mr. Vijay Satramdas Lakhani v. M/S. Hindustan Builders Thr. Partners And Others

20-ascp-593-2025+ modified.doc Sumedh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.593 OF 2025 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.225 OF 2024 Vijay Satramdas Lakhani ... Appellant V/s.

Hindustan Builderse Thr. Its Partners ... Respondent WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.225 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.6689 OF 2024 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.225 OF 2024 _______________________ Mr. Mutahhar Khan a/w. Adv. Devansh Shah, Adv. Dharmesh Joshi, Adv. Ritesh Yadav, Adv. Chinmay D. for the Petitioner/Applicant.

Mr. Atul Damle, Senior Advocate a/w. Adv. Suresh Sabrad, Adv. Jeetendra S., Adv. Amey Sawant, Adv. Neha Zanje, Adv. A.Patel, Adv. Pratik Sabrad, Adv. Eshwari Kudalkar i/by JS Legal for Respondent No.1.

Mr. Chetan Kapadia, Senior Advocate a/w. Adv. Rahul Sinha, Adv. Harshit Tyagi i/by DSK Legal for the Respondent-CIDCO. _______________________ CORAM : KAMAL KHATA, J.

DATED : 14TH JANUARY 2026.

P.C. :

1.

Advocate for Respondent No.1, on instructions, states that they would have no objection to the Appellant raising their contentions and claims on the basis of the subject agreement/s for 1/2 SUMEDH NAMDEO SONAWANE SUMEDH NAMDEO SONAWANE Date: 2026.01.23 12:39:37 +0530

20-ascp-593-2025+ modified.doc the proposed new building.

2.

In that view, the Appellant has no objection if the old building is demolished and Respondent proceeds with the construction of the new premises.

3.

The Appellant is at liberty to mention the matter for interim orders, if necessary.

4.

All contentions of the Appellant are kept open. 5.

List the matter on 12th February 2026.

(KAMAL KHATA, J.) Note: This Order is modified as per to the Speaking to the Minutes of Order dated 22nd January 2026. The corrections are shown in Italics. 2/2