Shreyas Purandar Hegde v. Municipal Corporation For Greater Mumbai And Another

912-ASAO-469-2024.DOC apn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.469 OF 2024 Shreyas Purandar Hegde ... Appellant v/s.

Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai & Anr.

... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.9671 OF 2024 ______________________ Mr. Dipesh Palwankar, i/by Mahesh Menon & Co. for the Appellant.

Mr. Om Suryavanshi, i/by Ms. Komal Punjabi for the Respondent-BMC.

________________________ CORAM : Kamal Khata, J.

DATED : 15th October 2025.

Digitally signed by ASHWINI GAJAKOSH Date:

2025.10.16 17:44:22 +0530 P.C.:- ASHWINI GAJAKOSH 1.

Mr. Palwankar, learned Advocate for the Appellant, is unable to point out any steps taken to set aside the order dated 18th June 2025 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court Room No.4 at Bombay City Civil Court, Bombay, dismissing the impugned Notice of Motion.

912-ASAO-469-2024.DOC 2.

The said order records that the Notice of Motion No.2320 of 2024 was dismissed for want of prosecution and for non-compliance with the directions of the Court. 3.

The present Appeal is admittedly arises from an adinterim order passed in the same Notice of Motion. Since the main Notice of Motion itself stands dismissed, nothing survives for consideration in this Appeal, which has consequently become infructuous.

4.

The Appeal is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. The connected Interim Applications also stand disposed of. (Kamal Khata, J.)