Chandrashekhar Sadashiv Karkhanis v. Arvind Sadashiv Karkhanis

9-CRA-138-2025.DOC Arun Sankpal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 138 OF 2025 Chandrashekhar Sadashiv Karkhanis ..Applicant

Versus

Arvind Sadashiv Karkhanis

...Respondent

Mr. Samir A. Vaidya (through VC), with Aditya Parmar & Zainab Khan, for the Applicant.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED :

28th APRIL 2025 P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Vaidya, the learned Counsel for the Applicant. 2.

The Applicant is aggrieved by an order passed by the First Appellate Court. The Writ Petition against the order passed by the First Appellate Court is not tenable. The proper remedy for the Petitioner is to prefer Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Procedure 1908.

ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Date: 2025.04.29 09:10:47 +0530 3.

The Petition stands disposed with liberty to the Petitioner to prefer a Second Appeal.

1/2

9-CRA-138-2025.DOC 4.

In the event such an Appeal is filed, the period spent in prosecuting this Application may be accounted for under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.

5.

Petition disposed.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2