Poonam Prakash Bhalerao v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary

cp654-24.doc drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.654 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 14722 OF 2023 Mayuresh Pradip Dale PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. Dhananjay A. Mane, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. K. S. Patil, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. Menezes Joslyn Anthony, Advocate for Respondent No.4 .......

WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.157 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 13082 OF 2023 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.158 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 14049 OF 2023 [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & SMT. VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.] DATE : 18 th SEPTEMBER, 2025 ORDER :

1.

On 17th September, 2025, an order is passed by Respondent No.2, on the proposals of the Petitioners, wherein deficiencies in the proposals are noted. So also, it is mentioned that there are no government orders in respect of the Petitioners. Another reason mentioned is that, 155 employees of Respondent No.4 Institution from Pune Division, have approached the

cp654-24.doc Principal Seat for individual approval, by filing Writ Petition No. 16775 of 2023. The present Petitioners are also party in the said Writ Petition. In that Petition, affidavit is filed by the second Respondent and the said Petition is pending. Unless final orders are passed in the said Writ Petition, it would not be proper to grant approval to the Petitioners. Appropriate action would be taken, after the decision in the Writ Petition No. 16775 of 2023. 2.

Respondents No.4 and 5 - Management to explain about the deficiencies mentioned in the order dated 17th September, 2025.

3.

Stand over to 9th October, 2025.

[ SMT. VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE drp/cp654-24.doc