Mangal Mohan Bhise And ORS v. Nanda Uttam Shinde And ORS
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.469 OF 2024 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders CORAM : S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL. - II) DATE : 13th November, 2024 Advocate Namit Pansare for Applicant Present.
The above numbered Civil Revision Application is listed on board of Registrar for second time. Already two weeks time has been granted, however, despite granting two weeks time, Advocate for the Applicant has not taken any steps against unserved Respondent Nos.4 & 5.
Here reference to Chapter VII Rule 6 Sub rule 1 and 2 of the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rules, 1960 (for short "Rules") may be conveniently made. It states about Processes, Process fees, Printing Charges, Security for costs and other procedure after admission etc.
In view of provisions under chapter VII Rule 6(1) (e), immediately after the expiry of the period prescribed under the forgoing
sub-rule of this rule for taking the requisite steps for the issue of fresh notice or for supplying postal stamps to cover the postal and registration charges, the office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which steps have not been taken for the issue fresh notices or the postal stamps to cover the postal and registration charges have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss the matter for failure to prosecute.
As such, the prescribed time to take steps against unserved Respondent Nos.4 & 5 as provided under Rules 1960 has been expired. 02 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress due to not taken any steps.
However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one opportunity to take steps against unserved Respondent Nos.4 & 5.
In turn, 02 (two) weeks time is granted with directions to take steps against unserved Respondent Nos.4 & 5 without fail.
On failure, Civil Revision Application would stand dismissed against unserved Respondent Nos.4 & 5 without further reference to the Court of Registrar.
sd/- Registrar (Judl. - II) dsm