← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/640/2024disposed off

Sharad Ramchandra Deshpande v. Dr. Maheshkumar Doiphode,The Commissioner,Nanded Waghala Municipal Corporation,

2024-07-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade3 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:15720-DB ( 1 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 73 CONT. PETITION NO. 640 OF 2024 IN WP/1078/2024 SHARAD RAMCHANDRA DESHPANDE

VERSUS

DR. MAHESHKUMAR DOIPHODE, THE COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND 74 CONT. PETITION NO. 641 OF 2024 IN WP/1111/2024 MANGLABAI W/O SHIVAJIRAO KULKARNI, THROUGH ITS POA SHIVAJIRAO S/O ANANTRAO KULKARNI

VERSUS

DR. MAHESHKUMAR DOIPHODE, THE COMMISSIONER, NANDED -WAGHALA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND 76 CONT. PETITION NO. 649 OF 2024 IN WP/1060/2024 AVINASH SHANKARRAO MOGADPALLY, (DIED) THROUGH LRS MAYUR AVINASH MOGADPALLY AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

DR. MAHESHKUMAR DOIPHODE THE COMMISSIONER NANDED WAGHALA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND 77 CONT. PETITION NO. 650 OF 2024 IN WP/1068/2024 RAJESH S/O KESHAVRAO SHAHANE

VERSUS

DR. MAHESHKUMAR DOIPHODE, COMMISSIONER NANDED WAGHALA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION NANDED

( 2 ) AND 81 CONT. PETITION NO. 665 OF 2024 IN WP/1105/2024 LAXMAN S/O SATWAJI BOIWAR

VERSUS

DR. MAHESHKUMAR DOIPHODE, THE COMMISSIONER, NANDED -WAGHALA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, .....

Advocate for the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suryawanshi Govind G. AGP for Respondents/State : Ms. Neha Kamble .....

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE :

23rd July, 2024 P.C. :- 1.

We have heard the learned advocates for the respective sides. The Petitioners claim to have approached the Commissioner vide order dated 15.02.2024 which is beyond the timeline given by this Court vide order dated 29.01.2024, passed in Writ Petition No.1060/2024 and connected petitions. The Deputy Superintendent Land Records, Nanded has placed a copy of the communication dated 21.03.2024 before us, which is marked as 'X' for identification. The learned AGP submits that the Petitioners were called upon to submit certain documents on the basis of which measurement charges could have been quantified. The Petitioners contend that they did not receive the said letter.

( 3 ) 2.

Be that as it may, the Petitioner would be better placed if they tender these documents as are required, in order to enable the Competent Authority to asses the charges for measurement. The learned advocate for the Petitioners submits on instructions that the Petitioners would tender the required documents to the Deputy Superintendent Land Records, Nanded within four weeks from today. We, therefore, direct that one week thereafter, the Deputy Superintendent Land Records would intimate the quantum of charges to the Petitioners. Within two weeks thereof, the Petitioners agree to deposit the measurement charges. Within four weeks thereafter, the Deputy Superintendent Land Records would carry out the measurement of the land with clear seven days notice to all the stake holders. 3.

In view of the above and by consent of the Petitioners, these Contempt Petitions are disposed off.

[Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.] [RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.] mub