Madhav S/O Sadashiv Hakele v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary,

(1) 966 CP-766.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 966 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 766 OF 2024 IN WP/8059/2020 MADHAV S/O SADASHIV HAKELE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, ...

Mr. Vishwajeet Ramesh Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.B. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent-State.

...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.

DATED : 11 FEBRUARY 2026.

Per Court :

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the order under contempt, respondent No.4 has decided the proposal of petitioner vide order dated 23rd January 2025. As such, direction appears to be complied with.

2.

However, since the proposal of the petitioner is rejected, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to challenge the same under appropriate provisions of law. In view of the same, the contempt petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner as aforesaid.

(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde