Amey Purushottam Kudchadkar v. Amruta Amey Kudchadkar

2025:BHC-AUG:11703

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 994 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5 OF 2025 IN WP/10069/2024 MOHAN GANPAT GANGARDE

VERSUS

BALASAHEB NARAYAN GANGARDE AND OTHERS Mr. N. C. Garud, Advocate for the applicant

CORAM

: R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 23rd APRIL, 2025 PER COURT :- 1.

In spite of service of notice, none appears for the proposed respondents i.e. LR's of deceased respondent No.4. Their absence indicate that they have no inclination to oppose the application. 2.

Perusal of the application shows that the delay caused in filing of the application to bring LR's of deceased respondent is not intentional. No prejudice will cause to the proposed respondents if the application is allowed.

3.

Hence, application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause ' B'. Amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp 994.ca5.25.odt