Manik Bhaurao Thakur (Taur) v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Jalna And ORS.

2025:BHC-AUG:16432 1 982(i).CA.514-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 514 OF 2025 IN FAST/30523/2024 MANIK BHAURAO THAKUR (TAUR)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS.

...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Jadhav Kailas B Advocate for Respondents/State : Mr. D. B. Bhange ...

CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 26th JUNE 2025 PER COURT :

1.

Heard learned Counsel Mr. Jadhav for the Applicant, learned AGP Mr. Bhange for State.

None for the Respondents/Acquiring Body.

2.

Applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 6030 days in preferring First Appeal for enhancement. For the reasons stated in Paragraph Nos. 2 to 4, delay is sought to be condoned. 3.

Learned AGP opposes the application.

4.

Respondent-Acquiring Body has not caused appearance. In the absence of any rebuttal to the grounds stated in the application, I find no reason to refuse the request.

2 982(i).CA.514-2025.doc 5.

Applicant is ready to forgo interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. It is desirable to condone delay. 6.

Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'. SHAILESH P. BRAHME JUDGE NAJEEB..