Tapi Irrigation Development Corporation Jalgaon Thr The Ex. Engineer, M.I.W Div. Jalgaon v. Bhaskar Sukdev Patil And ORS

2025:BHC-AUG:13152-DB 925-8-CA-5028-25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 925 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5028 OF 2025 IN FA/382/2021 TAPI IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION JALGAON THR THE EX. ENGINEER, M.I.W DIV. JALGAON

VERSUS

RAMCHANDRA NATTHU PATIL AND OTHERS ...

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1620 OF 2024 IN FA/382/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2877 OF 2024 IN FA/382/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3714 OF 2021 IN FA/382/2021 ...

926 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5033 OF 2025 IN FA/380/2021 TAPI IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION JALGAON THR THE EX. ENGINEER, M.I.W DIV. JALGAON

VERSUS

SHIVRAM SHANKAR PATIL (DIED) THR LRS RATAN AND ORS ...

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1618 OF 2024 IN FA/380/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2876 OF 2024 IN FA/380/2021 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 380 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3709 OF 2021 IN FA/380/2021 ...

927 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5045 OF 2025 IN FA/379/2021 TAPI IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION JALGAON THR THE EX. ENGINEER, M.I.W DIV. JALGAON

VERSUS

BHANGI PUNA VANJARI AND ORS ...

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1619 OF 2024 IN FA/379/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2873 OF 2024 IN FA/379/2021 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 379 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3705 OF 2021 IN FA/379/2021 ...

928 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5056 OF 2025 IN FA/381/2021 TAPI IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION JALGAON THR THE EX. ENGINEER, M.I.W DIV. JALGAON

VERSUS

BHASKAR SUKDEV PATIL AND ORS ...

925-8-CA-5028-25.odt WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1617 OF 2024 IN FA/381/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2875 OF 2024 IN FA/381/2021 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 381 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3712 OF 2021 IN FA/381/2021 ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sandesh R. Patil Addl.GP for Respondents/State : Mr. Kalpalata Patil Bharaswadkar Advocate for Respondent/claimants : Ms. Shilpa D. Magre h/f. Mr. Vijay B. Patil ...

CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : 02-05-2025 PER COURT:- 1.

Heard.

2.

These applications are filed for extension of time and continuation of stay.

3.

Learned Advocate for the applicant states that the applicant was granted stay on condition to deposit 40% amount of compensation. However, the applicant could not deposit 40% amount within stipulated time. He submits that now the applicant is ready to deposit 100% amount.

4.

For the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed in terms of prayer clause (B), subject to the condition that entire compensation alongwith accrued interest shall be deposited within a week from today.

[MANJUSHA DESHPANDE] [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE JUDGE rrd