Pravin Dileep Dhale And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others

{1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 915 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1873 OF 2024 IN WP/180/2024 GORAKH MORESHWAR DEOKAR AND OTHERS ....Applicant

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS .....Respondent .....

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Temak Rahul Bhausaheb GP for Respondent/State: Mr. A.B. Girase.

Mr. P.S. Paranjape.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 180 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1763 OF 2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1875 OF 2024 IN WP/12998/2023 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1876 OF 2024 IN WP/13025/2023 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1874 OF 2024 IN WP/13008/2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1764 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 13025 OF 2023

{2} WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 13008 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12192 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 13705 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12998 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 15906 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 15701 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 126 OF 2024 CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.

DATE : 21st FEBRUARY. 2024.

P.C. :- 1.

Learned advocate Mr. Paranjape, appearing for respondent No.4 seeks further accommodation to file affidavit-in-reply, which the learned advocate for the petitioner has objected. However, as a last chance, we may grant time to respondent No.4 to file affidavit-in-reply in view of the fact that the learned advocate Mr. Paranjape is making a statement, upon instructions, that the respondent No.4 will not go ahead with the appointment, in view of the advertisement, for a period of two weeks.

{3} 2.

Affidavit in reply be filed within a period of two weeks. Place the matter for further consideration on 11.3.2024. It is clarified that till that date, respondent No.4 shall not go ahead with the appointments. 3.

De-tag W.P. No. 12192 of 2022 and W.P. 13705 of 2021. [S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J] grt/-