Uddhav Ashru Hinge v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

( 1 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 941 FIRST APPEAL NO. 375 OF 2016 UDDHAV ASHRU HINGE AND OTHERS ...

Mr. S. S. Dande, AGP for Appellant Mr. D. R. Jayabhar, Advocate for Respondent No.1 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6392 OF 2024 IN FA/375/2016 UDDHAV ASHRU HINGE FIRST APPEAL NO. 1338 OF 2016 RAMESH UTTAM HINGE AND OTHERS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12790 OF 2014 IN FA/1338/2016 RAMESH UTTAM HINGE AND OTHERS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10489 OF 2022 IN FA/1340/2016 KESHAV S/O MANIK HINGE FIRST APPEAL NO. 1341 OF 2016 DEVRAO NATHU CHAVATE

( 2 ) FIRST APPEAL NO. 1349 OF 2016 BHAURAO NAMDEO SHELKE FIRST APPEAL NO. 1344 OF 2016 VITTHAL NARAYAN HINGE AND OTHERS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1336 OF 2016 BHAGWAN SAKHARAM HINGE FIRST APPEAL NO. 373 OF 2016 LAHU HARIBHAU KAMBLE FIRST APPEAL NO. 1347 OF 2016 BHAUSAHEB BHUJANGRAO HINGE FIRST APPEAL NO. 1342 OF 2016 SANTRAM PUNJA HINGE AND OTHERS FIRST APPEAL NO. 372 OF 2016 PARMESHWAR DATTU HINGE AND OTHERS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1343 OF 2016

( 3 ) BALIRAM PUNJA HINGE AND OTHERS FIRST APPEAL NO. 374 OF 2016 PRABHAKAR SAHEBRAO HINGE AND OTHERS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1339 OF 2016 SANDIPAN PUNJA HINGE AND OTHERS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1348 OF 2016 SUSHILABAI ASHRU SHINDE AND OTHERS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1340 OF 2016 SHESHRAO KUNDLIK HINGE AND OTHERS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1346 OF 2016 DINKAR NATHA HINGE AND OTHERS ...

CORAM

: AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.

DATE : 01.10.2025 PER COURT :-

( 4 ) 1.

Mr. Dande, learned AGP, would fairly submit that, as far as land valuation is concerned, the appeals may now be settled on that point since the valuation would be less than four times the amount granted by the SLAO. Mr. Dande would submit that the only issue now to be dealt with is the valuation of the trees, which, according to the appellants, has been exhaustively addressed by the learned Reference Court. Mr. Dande, learned AGP, would submit that he shall prepare a chart for every matter in this group, showing matter-wise how much was granted for the trees by the SLAO and how much was granted by the learned Reference Court. Mr. Dande would submit that compiling the enhancement in such a chart would make it easier to adjudicate these matters, as only a very small amount of controversy remains in the cases. 2.

Mr. Jayabhar, learned counsel for respondent no. 1, also agrees to this and undertakes to cooperate with Mr. Dande, learned AGP, in preparing such a chart to facilitate earlier adjudication of the First Appeals. 3.

Stand over to 04.11.2025.

[AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] PRW