← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/6893/2024admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

The Executive Engineer Seena Kolegaon Project Division Paranda v. Uttam Narayan Patil And ORS

2025-04-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:12257 (1) 60-ca-6693-2024-delay.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6893 OF 2024 IN FAST/18724/2024 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER SEENA KOLEGAON PROJECT DIVISION PARANDA

VERSUS

UTTAM NARAYAN PATIL AND ORS ...

Mr. Rahul A. Tambe, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. D. A. Madake, Advocate for Respondent No.1. ...

CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

DATED : 25th APRIL, 2025.

P.C.:- 1.

Heard Mr. Tambe, learned Advocate appearing for applicant. 2.

By this application, applicant seeks to condone delay of 1925 days caused in filing Appeal.

3.

Perused reasons as stated in application. Apparently, delay has been occasioned on account of administrative exigency and procedural reasons. The applicant has not derived any advantage by making such delay. Hence, sufficient cause is made out to condone delay. Hence, following order:

ORDER

a.

Civil Application is allowed.

b.

Delay of 1925 days caused in filing appeal is hereby condoned.

c.

Appeal be registered.

d.

On registration of Appeal, Admit.

(2) 60-ca-6693-2024-delay.odt e.

The respective Advocates waives notice for respective respondents.

f.

Print and paper book dispensed with.

(S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR) JUDGE Devendra/April-2025