Mohiuddin Hussiouddin Lrs Bilaquesbegum And Others v. Muthuappa Bhauappa Shiwale L.Rs. Kusumbai L.Rs. Shivdas And Others
2025:BHC-AUG:16252 1 1033 ca 7940.24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7940 OF 2024 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1742 OF 2024 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 548 OF 1989 Mohiuddin Hussiouddin Since deceased through L.Rs.
Bilaquiesbegum and others .. Applicants
Versus
Muthuappa Hauappa Shiwale Since deceased through L.Rs.
Kusumbai died L.Rs.
Shivdas and others .. Respondents Mrs. A. N. Ansari, Advocate for the Applicants. Shri V. S. Solshe, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1-B and 1-C. CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 24TH JUNE, 2025.
FINAL ORDER :
.
Heard Mrs. Ansari, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. V. C. Solshe, learned counsel for the respondent Nos 1-B and 1C. None appears for the respondent No. 2, though served. 2.
Present application is for condonation of delay, setting abatement and bringing heirs of the deceased respondent NO. 2/Matnoddin Hussouddin on record.
2 1033 ca 7940.24 3.
It is submitted by the applicant that the delay is not intentional. For the reasons stated in para Nos. 3 to 5 of the application the delay is caused. It is further submitted that cause of action survives against heirs of the deceased respondent No. 2. They are necessary parties.
4.
Learned counsel Mr. Solshe appearing for the respondents submits that applicant No. 1 is real brother of the deceased respondent No. 2. It cannot been conceived that death of the respondent No. 2 was not within his knowledge. There is huge delay. Application is liable to be rejected. 5.
I have considered rival submissions of the parties. Second appeal preferred by the applicant has not been restored, however in attempting to restore the same, applicants are required to face these technicalities. Applicant No. 1 and the respondent No. 2 are brothers. In all probabilities, due to strained relations consequences of death might have been overlooked. In the present case, heirs of the deceased are necessary parties as cause of action survives against them.
6.
It is desirable to allow the present application by imposing cost. The civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses "B" and "C" on condition that the applicants shall pay cost of Rs. 3,000/- (Rs. Three thousands only) to the High Court Advocate's Bar Association Aurangabad within a period of three (03) weeks from today. Necessary amendment to be carried out within a
3 1033 ca 7940.24 period of two (02) weeks from today. The civil application is disposed of.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ] bsb/June 25