Hanif Mainoddin Saudagar And ANR v. Naseem Nayyum Hundekar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 74 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8731 OF 2024 IN FAST/3326/2024 Hanif Mainoddin Saudagar And Anr

VERSUS

Naseem Nayyum Hundekar And Ors ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Nirmal Ramrao G. Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Sayyed Zoebumair Zulfequar For R/4, Mr. Usmanpurkar Aniruddha S. For R/5, Mr. Imale Ramesh R. For R/2 CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

Dated : April 09, 2025 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard learned advocates appearing for the respective parties.

2.

There is delay of 22 days caused in filing the appeal against judgment and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. Perused reasons stated in paragraph nos.2 and 3 of the application. Hence, sufficient cause is made out. In that view of the matter, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' and disposed of.

3.

Appeal be registered on removal of office objections. ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ) ...

aaa/-