Shaikh Mohammad Ismail And ANR v. Sopan Sonaji Gore And ORS

1 26 fa 2714.24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO. 2714 OF 2024 Jayavantabai Ratan More (Koli) and others .. Appellants

Versus

Baijanath T. Sing and another .. Respondents Shri Madhav M. Bhokarikar, Advocate for the Appellants. Shri D. B. Bhange and Shri B. A. Shinde, A.G.P. for the Respondents/State in respective matters.

AND 27 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2958 OF 2024 WITH C. A. NO. 12764 OF 2024 IN FA/2958/2024 28 FIRST APPEAL NO. 3164 OF 2024 29 FIRST APPEAL NO. 3166 OF 2024 30 FIRST APPEAL NO. 176 OF 2025 32 FIRST APPEAL NO. 697 OF 2025 33 C. A. NO. 8723 OF 2024 IN FAST/22040/2024 WITH C. A. NO. 8724 OF 2024 IN FAST/22040/2024 34 C. A. NO. 10976 OF 2024 IN FAST/27114/2024 35 C. A. NO. 10980 OF 2024 IN FAST/25613/2024 36 C. A. NO. 10988 OF 2024 IN FAST/24465/2024 37 C. A. NO. 2095 OF 2025 IN FAST/3997/2025 WITH C. A. NO. 2096 OF 2025 IN FAST/3997/2025

2 26 fa 2714.24 38 C. A. NO. 2105 OF 2025 IN FAST/4012/2025 WITH C. A. NO. 2106 OF 2025 IN FAST/4012/2025 39 C. A. NO. 2144 OF 2025 IN FAST/34088/2024 WITH C. A. NO. 2145 OF 2025 IN FAST/34088/2024 40 C. A. NO. 2441 OF 2025 IN FAST/4003/2025 WITH C. A. NO. 2440 OF 2025 IN FAST/4003/2025 41 C. A. NO. 3308 OF 2025 IN FAST/9256/2025 WITH C. A. NO. 3309 OF 2025 IN FAST/9256/2025 42 C. A. NO. 3480 OF 2025 IN FAST/7326/2024 WITH C. A. NO. 3481 OF 2025 IN FAST/7326/2024 43 C. A. NO. 3634 OF 2025 IN FAST/9895/2025 WITH C. A. NO. 3635 OF 2025 IN FAST/9895/2025 44 C. A. NO. 3658 OF 2025 IN FAST/8671/2025 WITH C. A. NO. 8180 OF 2025 IN FAST/8671/2025 C. A. NO. 3659 OF 2025 IN FAST/8671/2025 45 C. A. NO. 3886 OF 2025 IN FAST/9999/2025 47 SECOND APPEAL NO. 74 OF 2025 CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 04TH AUGUST, 2025.

ORDER :

1.

Time of four (4) weeks is granted to take steps against the

3 26 fa 2714.24 dead respondents as well as unserved respondents. 2.

In case, fresh address is provided for the service of notice, then notice shall be issued, returnable after six (06) weeks. 3.

In case for some technical reasons, the notices are unserved, re-issue notice to the unserved respondents, returnable six (06) weeks thereafter.

4.

In case of remark of want of time, the time is extended by six (06) weeks.

5.

Interim relief, granted earlier, if any, to continue till the next date.

6.

Humdast/private service is permitted.

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ] bsb/Aug. 25