Jiyalal Motilal Rajbhar v. Michael Pareira

Sonali Mane 36-CP-5-2025.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 5 OF 2025 Jiyalal Motilal Rajbhar ... Petitioner

Versus

Michael Pareira ... Respondent Mr. Kapil P. Shetye for the Petitioner.

Mr. Ajit S. Hodage for the Respondent.

CORAM

: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

DATE : 15 JANUARY 2025.

P.C. :

1) The learned counsel appearing for Respondent, on taking instructions, makes a statement that Respondent has not dispossessed the Petitioner.

2) The learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that a lock has been put by Respondent at the suit premises after dispossessing the Petitioner. The learned counsel for the Respondent would clarify that the Respondent has not put lock at the suit premises. In that view of the matter, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner would submit that Petitioner would take back possession of the premises in question since Respondent does not claim possession nor asserts that he has put lock at the suit premises.

3) List the Contempt Petition for further consideration on MANE SONALI DILIP 25 February 2025.

MANE SONALI DILIP Date: 2025.01.18 13:33:56 +0530 [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] ___Page No.

1 of 1 ___ 15 January 2025